Legislative Information System

Options:
1.
View Reports by Status
  • Published
  • Pending
  • Overdue
  • 2.
    Search Reports
    3.
    Register to receive report status email notification.


    Document Summary
    - Report Published -

    Senate Document No. 22
    PUBLICATION YEAR 1999

    Document Title
    Study on the Feasibility of Establishing a High Risk Pool in Virginia

    Author
    Joint Commission on Health Care

    Enabling Authority
    SJR 126 (1998)

    Executive Summary
    Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 126 of the 1998 Session of the General
    Assembly directed the Joint Commission on Health Care to continue its
    study of the feasibility of establishing a high risk insurance pool in
    Virginia.

    Specifically, SJR 126 directed the Joint Commission's study to
    include an analysis of: (i) the problems encountered by high risk
    individuals in obtaining affordable health insurance coverage; (ii) whether
    the current "open enrollment" program, a high risk pool, or other
    mechanism would best serve the needs of persons with high risk medical
    conditions; (iii) which type of approach provides the best mechanism for
    insuring high risk persons in terms of its impact on the health insurance
    market; (iv) which type of program provides the Commonwealth with the
    best approach to insuring high risk individuals; and (v) the practicality of
    administering both an open enrollment program and a high risk pool.

    Based on our research and analysis during this review, we
    concluded the following:

    *states have taken different approaches to covering persons
    with high risk medical conditions: (i) 27 states have
    established high risk insurance pools; (ii) 9 states have a
    guaranteed issue requirement in the individual market; (iii) 6
    states, including Virginia, and the District of Columbia
    administer open enrollment programs; (iv) 2 states have
    adopted other programs for high risk persons; and (v) 6 states
    have not adopted any mechanism to cover high risk persons;

    *Virginia's open enrollment program provides comprehensive
    health insurance to persons with high risk medical conditions;
    Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield and Blue Cross and Blue Shield
    of the National Capital Area are the Commonwealths two
    open enrollment carriers;

    *overall, the level and cost of the health insurance coverage
    offered through Virginia's open enrollment program are
    comparable to that offered through high risk pools in other
    states;

    *the open enrollment program provides reasonable access to
    coverage for persons with high risk medical conditions as
    evidenced by the fact that, in 1997, there were approximately
    21,000 Virginians enrolled in the program;

    *the Commonwealth imposes a lower premium tax rate on
    open enrollment carriers (0.75%) than other carriers (2.25%) on
    premiums derived from individual subscriber contracts to
    subsidize the cost of the program; in 1997, this tax differential
    amounted to $5.4 million;

    *because the cost and level of coverage available through
    Virginia's open enrollment program are generally comparable
    to high risk pools in other states, it would appear that the only
    reason to move away from the open enrollment program
    would be to change the manner in which the cost of covering
    uninsurable persons currently is shared among enrollees, the
    insurance industry, and the Commonwealth; and

    *except in very limited circumstances, no state currently
    operates both a high risk pool and an open enrollment
    program; administering two programs in Virginia would be
    duplicative.

    A number of policy options were offered for consideration by the
    Joint Commission on Health Care regarding the issues discussed in this
    report.
    Our review process on this topic included an initial staff briefing,
    which comprises the body of this report. This was followed by a public
    comment period during which time interested parties forwarded written
    comments to us regarding the report. The public comments provide
    additional insight into the various issues covered in this report.