- Report Published -
|Hospital Emergency Room Violence (SJR 358, 2009)|
|Virginia State Crime Commission|
|SJR 358 (Regular Session, 2009)|
The Code of Virginia, § 30-156, authorizes the Virginia State Crime Commission (“Crime Commission”) to study, report and make recommendations on all areas of public safety and protection. In so doing, the Crime Commission shall endeavor to ascertain the causes of crime and recommend ways to reduce and prevent it, explore and recommend methods of rehabilitation of convicted criminals, study compensation of persons in law enforcement and related fields and study other related matters including apprehension, trial and punishment of criminal offenders. (*1) Section 30-158(3) empowers the Crime Commission to conduct studies and gather information and data in order to accomplish its purpose as set forth in § 30-156 … and formulate its recommendations to the Governor and the General Assembly.
Senate Joint Resolution 358 (SJR 358), (*2) introduced by Senator Kenneth W. Stolle during the 2009 Regular Session of the General Assembly, directed the Crime Commission to study issues of public safety in hospital emergency rooms. Specifically, it was resolved that the Crime Commission be directed to:
• Research public safety issues that exist in hospital emergency rooms, including the occurrence of violent incidents in hospital emergency rooms across the Commonwealth;
• Compile strategies that can be used by hospitals to prevent or deal with violent incidents; and,
• Identify the most effective methods of preventing emergency room violence and of dealing with violent incidents when they occur. (*3)
Also incorporated into this study was House Bill 2436 (HB 2436), referred to the Crime Commission by the House Courts of Justice Committee. This bill was introduced during the 2009 Regular Session of the General Assembly by Delegate Christopher K. Peace to address violence occurring in hospital emergency departments across the Commonwealth. (*4) Specifically, this bill sought to amend and reenact section C of § 18.2-57, the so called “protected class” in the assault and battery statute, by adding emergency room personnel defined as physicians, physicians’ assistants, nurses, or nurse practitioners while engaged in the performance of his duties as an emergency health care provider in an emergency room of a hospital or clinic or on the premises of any other facility rendering emergency medical care. (*5) The emergency department employees that were to be added in the bill were doctors, nurses, physicians’ assistants, and nurse practitioners.
The Crime Commission utilized several methodologies to address the directives of the mandate regarding emergency department (ED) (*6) violence, including: completing a literature and legislative review; creating a workgroup of medical and academic practitioners; attending emergency department security awareness training; identifying available data; and, conducting field observations.
There was very little literature available concerning ED violence and the studies that were available typically suffered from limitations that prevented the application of their findings to EDs in general. There has been some legislative activity addressing hospital violence in the last few years by a few states: California, Washington, Oregon, and New Jersey. Unfortunately, as with the literature review, there are practically no known published comprehensive reviews available that detail the results of any of the legislation in reducing violent behavior directed at ED staff. Staff also did a 50 state survey of assault and battery statutes and determined that a little over half (26) of the states provide an enhanced or increased punishment for assaults directed at ED staff.
In order for the Crime Commission to better understand ED violence, staff invited medical and academic practitioners who were familiar with ED violence to participate in our ED violence workgroup. The following is a summary of the important issues discussed at the workgroup meeting:
• Many assaults go unreported.
• Local law enforcement data will not be specific enough to determine if the assaults occurred in the ED.
• Security varies from hospital to hospital, from full time, deputized officers to a few private security officers.
• A significant percentage of the violent or assaultive behavior is caused by patients with mental disorders or patients with drug or alcohol addictions.
• There is a reluctance to press charges against patients with mental disorders, as well as difficulties prosecuting them.
• Security training available to ED staff varies from hospital to hospital.
• Strategies to prevent or deal with violent incidents vary by hospital.
Additionally, staff conducted field visits to two local hospitals. During ED visits, staff formally met with police and security personnel to discuss their roles, activities, and difficulties as well as proactive measures undertaken to promote ED safety. These visits helped to provide an understanding of ED operations, allowed staff to observe the environment in EDs and the attached waiting rooms, identify potential data sources and their limitations, and to confirm information gathered from the workgroup and the literature review.
The most significant problem encountered with the study is the lack of reliable data concerning the prevalence of violent incidents in EDs in the Commonwealth, as well as nationally. Likewise, there are very few reports that address preventative measures that EDs can take to reduce violence. While there is some data available from U.S. Department of Labor, Virginia State Police, and local law enforcement departments, this data does not possess the requisite precision to determine if the violent acts occurred in hospital EDs, doctor’s offices, or outpatient clinics or if the incidents were even related to violent acts against ED personnel. Subsequently, there is no way to determine how much of a problem violent incidents are in EDs throughout in the Commonwealth.
Given the lack of available data, it is difficult to make informed legislative or policy decisions regarding ED violence in the Commonwealth. As a result of this study, no formal recommendations were made by the Crime Commission.
(*1) VA. CODE ANN § 30-156 (Michie 2009).
(*2) S.J.R. 358, 2009 Gen. Assem., Reg. Sess. (Va. 2009).
(*4) H.B. 2436, 2009 Gen. Assem., Reg. Sess. (Va. 2009).
(*5) Id. The emergency department employees that were to be added in the bill were doctors, nurses, physicians’ assistants, and nurse practitioners.
(*6) While the study resolution refers specifically to “Emergency Rooms,” the common term used by persons involved in the hospital profession is “Emergency Department.”